<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nuclearmatters.co.uk &#187; ap1000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/tag/ap1000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk</link>
	<description>Making Sense Of Nuclear Industry Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Q4 2011 GDA Report</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2012/02/q4-2011-gda-report/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2012/02/q4-2011-gda-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=2418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the latest routine quarterly report on the progress of Generic Design Assessment (GDA) of the AP1000® and UK EPR™ reactors. It follows the issuing of interim design acceptance by ONR and the Environment Agency in December 2011.  This last quarter has been one of the most significant in the GDA programme as we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2012/02/q4-2011-gda-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interim Approval for AP1000</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/interim-approval-for-ap1000/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/interim-approval-for-ap1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=2188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse Electric Company is delighted that the UK regulators – Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) and Environment Agency (EA) &#8211; have today granted Interim Design Acceptance Confirmation (IDAC) and Interim Statement of Design Acceptability (ISoDA) to the company&#8217;s AP1000® reactor design. The announcement comes after four and a half years of work as part of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/interim-approval-for-ap1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westinghouse Signs MOU With DBD</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/westinghouse-signs-mou-with-dbd/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/westinghouse-signs-mou-with-dbd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dbd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=2174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse have announced an important Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with DBD Limited relating to the future development of the Westinghouse AP1000® reactor design in the UK. The agreement covers a range of topics where it is hoped that the two organizations can collaborate to help bring the AP1000 nuclear power plant into commercial operation in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/westinghouse-signs-mou-with-dbd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP1000 Maintains Robustness and Is Safe</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/09/ap1000-maintains-robustness-and-is-safe/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/09/ap1000-maintains-robustness-and-is-safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has concluded that changes proposed in the AP1000® Design Control Document (DCD) amendment, including those made in Revision 19, maintain the robustness of the previously certified design and that the revised design can be built and operated without undue risk to the health and safety of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/09/ap1000-maintains-robustness-and-is-safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Safety Evaluation Report for AP1000</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/08/final-safety-evaluation-report-for-ap1000/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/08/final-safety-evaluation-report-for-ap1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse Electric Company received notification from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that it is issuing its Final Safety Evaluation Report on the AP1000 pressurized water reactor (PWR) design in the current design certification amendment proceeding. The report, which is slated for public issuance later this week, comes after Westinghouse submitted design changes in Revision 18 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/08/final-safety-evaluation-report-for-ap1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westinghouse Major Step Towards AP1000 Licensing Approval</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/07/westinghouse-major-step-towards-ap1000-licensing-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/07/westinghouse-major-step-towards-ap1000-licensing-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse today welcomed the announcement from the UK nuclear safety regulator that the “Regulatory Issue” connected with the design of the AP1000 has been lifted. This move clears a significant obstacle on the pathway towards Design Acceptance Confirmation by the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), that is currently assessing the AP1000 reactor as part of the UK [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/07/westinghouse-major-step-towards-ap1000-licensing-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westinghouse Clarifies Facts on AP1000</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/05/westinghouse-clarifies-facts-on-ap1000/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/05/westinghouse-clarifies-facts-on-ap1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 09:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Officials of Westinghouse Electric Company say they are disappointed that recent U.S. NRC statements regarding the discovery of new issues relating to the approval of design amendments for the AP1000® nuclear power plant are being misinterpreted and sensationalized. The company also said the NRC statements, including a news release issued May 20, do not reflect Westinghouse&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/05/westinghouse-clarifies-facts-on-ap1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear Power Delivery UK Agreements With Major UK Companies</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/01/nuclear-power-delivery-uk-agreements-with-major-uk-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/01/nuclear-power-delivery-uk-agreements-with-major-uk-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Delivery UK announced today that Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) have been signed with three of the biggest names in the UK nuclear industry supply chain – BAE Systems, Doosan Power Systems and Rolls-Royce. These new agreements build on MOUs signed with the same three organisations by Westinghouse back in September 2008. Nuclear Power [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/01/nuclear-power-delivery-uk-agreements-with-major-uk-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rolls-Royce to Support Delivery of Westinghouse AP1000</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/01/rolls-royce-to-support-delivery-of-westinghouse-ap1000/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/01/rolls-royce-to-support-delivery-of-westinghouse-ap1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolls royce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rolls-Royce today signed an agreement to collaborate with the Nuclear Power Delivery UK (NPD) consortium in its plans to deploy the Westinghouse AP1000™ nuclear reactor in the UK. Under the terms of the agreement, Rolls-Royce will support NPD in the development of proposals for engineering, manufacture and supply of mission critical components for the heart [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/01/rolls-royce-to-support-delivery-of-westinghouse-ap1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Favorable Safety Evaluation From NRC on AP1000 Design</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2010/12/favorable-safety-evaluation-from-nrc-on-ap1000-design/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2010/12/favorable-safety-evaluation-from-nrc-on-ap1000-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pwr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse Electric Company announced today that it has submitted the Design Certification Amendment application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for its AP1000™ Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) design. Additionally, the NRC has issued its Advanced Final Safety Evaluation on the design, concluding that the AP1000 PWR is safe and meets all regulatory requirements. Upon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2010/12/favorable-safety-evaluation-from-nrc-on-ap1000-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

