<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nuclearmatters.co.uk &#187; westinghouse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/tag/westinghouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk</link>
	<description>Making Sense Of Nuclear Industry Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rosatom Looks at Horizon Opportunity</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2012/04/rosatom-looks-at-horizon-opportunity/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2012/04/rosatom-looks-at-horizon-opportunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosatom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=2634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russia’s state-owned nuclear energy enterprise Rosatom has said it would propose building the Generation III+ PWR 1200-MWe NPP 2006 in the UK. Rosatom is so far the only company to confirm an interest in the Horizon Nuclear Power after Horizon’s German owners announced plans to withdraw from the UK nuclear market March 29 and put [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2012/04/rosatom-looks-at-horizon-opportunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westinghouse Statement Regarding RWE and E.ON Announcements</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2012/03/westinghouse-statement-regarding-rwe-and-e-on-announcements/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2012/03/westinghouse-statement-regarding-rwe-and-e-on-announcements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npd uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=2551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse and NPD UK are disappointed in the decision made by E.ON and RWE not to proceed with plans for new nuclear energy stations in the United Kingdom. Significant work over the last few years with their 50-50 joint venture – Horizon Nuclear Power – has made it very clear to Westinghouse that new nuclear [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2012/03/westinghouse-statement-regarding-rwe-and-e-on-announcements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interim Approval for AP1000</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/interim-approval-for-ap1000/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/interim-approval-for-ap1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=2188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse Electric Company is delighted that the UK regulators – Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) and Environment Agency (EA) &#8211; have today granted Interim Design Acceptance Confirmation (IDAC) and Interim Statement of Design Acceptability (ISoDA) to the company&#8217;s AP1000® reactor design. The announcement comes after four and a half years of work as part of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/interim-approval-for-ap1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westinghouse Signs MOU With DBD</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/westinghouse-signs-mou-with-dbd/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/westinghouse-signs-mou-with-dbd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dbd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=2174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse have announced an important Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with DBD Limited relating to the future development of the Westinghouse AP1000® reactor design in the UK. The agreement covers a range of topics where it is hoped that the two organizations can collaborate to help bring the AP1000 nuclear power plant into commercial operation in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/12/westinghouse-signs-mou-with-dbd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Safety Evaluation Report for AP1000</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/08/final-safety-evaluation-report-for-ap1000/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/08/final-safety-evaluation-report-for-ap1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse Electric Company received notification from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that it is issuing its Final Safety Evaluation Report on the AP1000 pressurized water reactor (PWR) design in the current design certification amendment proceeding. The report, which is slated for public issuance later this week, comes after Westinghouse submitted design changes in Revision 18 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/08/final-safety-evaluation-report-for-ap1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westinghouse Major Step Towards AP1000 Licensing Approval</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/07/westinghouse-major-step-towards-ap1000-licensing-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/07/westinghouse-major-step-towards-ap1000-licensing-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse today welcomed the announcement from the UK nuclear safety regulator that the “Regulatory Issue” connected with the design of the AP1000 has been lifted. This move clears a significant obstacle on the pathway towards Design Acceptance Confirmation by the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), that is currently assessing the AP1000 reactor as part of the UK [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/07/westinghouse-major-step-towards-ap1000-licensing-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westinghouse Passive Thermal Shutdown Seal</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/06/westinghouse-passive-thermal-shutdown-seal/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/06/westinghouse-passive-thermal-shutdown-seal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse Electric Company has developed and implemented a passive thermal shutdown seal that protects a nuclear plant&#8217;s reactor core. It does this by preventing loss of reactor coolant system water inventory should an event occur that causes a loss of all reactor coolant pump (RCP) seal cooling. The SHIELD® passive thermal shutdown seal is a fail-safe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/06/westinghouse-passive-thermal-shutdown-seal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westinghouse Clarifies Facts on AP1000</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/05/westinghouse-clarifies-facts-on-ap1000/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/05/westinghouse-clarifies-facts-on-ap1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 09:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Officials of Westinghouse Electric Company say they are disappointed that recent U.S. NRC statements regarding the discovery of new issues relating to the approval of design amendments for the AP1000® nuclear power plant are being misinterpreted and sensationalized. The company also said the NRC statements, including a news release issued May 20, do not reflect Westinghouse&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2011/05/westinghouse-clarifies-facts-on-ap1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Favorable Safety Evaluation From NRC on AP1000 Design</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2010/12/favorable-safety-evaluation-from-nrc-on-ap1000-design/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2010/12/favorable-safety-evaluation-from-nrc-on-ap1000-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pwr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westinghouse Electric Company announced today that it has submitted the Design Certification Amendment application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for its AP1000™ Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) design. Additionally, the NRC has issued its Advanced Final Safety Evaluation on the design, concluding that the AP1000 PWR is safe and meets all regulatory requirements. Upon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2010/12/favorable-safety-evaluation-from-nrc-on-ap1000-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear Power Delivery UK Sign Contract With Horizon</title>
		<link>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2010/08/nuclear-power-delivery-uk-sign-contract-with-horizon/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2010/08/nuclear-power-delivery-uk-sign-contract-with-horizon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sixep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/?p=718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Delivery UK &#8211; the delivery organisation for the Westinghouse-designed AP1000™ nuclear reactor &#8211; today signed a contract with Horizon Nuclear Power for preliminary work to be carried out between now and the end of the year, as part of preparatory design studies for Horizon&#8217;s proposed new power station in North Wales. Managing Director [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclearmatters.co.uk/2010/08/nuclear-power-delivery-uk-sign-contract-with-horizon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

